How do sports writers blur news and opinion?
What are the implications of this?
Sports writers tend to report facts and evidence, but structure articles in order to fit a certain narrative that aligns with their views. This can mislead readers, as they might confuse opinions and facts, and their perspective can be greately influenced by their readings. These articles can increase tension in the sports, where authors push a specific narrative, usually through archetypes such as "hero vs villain".
Justin Gatlin gatecrashes Usain Bolt’s London 2017 farewell party in 100m
The picture in the article, appears to show Usain Bolt ahead of the competition, likely due to the angle. The idea given by the picture is the opposite of that in the actual article, which explains how Usain lost the race.
Additionally in the image Usain Bolt, he has his head down, and his arms held back, as he propels himself. The pose is reminiscent of the Greek mythological character of Atlas, communicating Usain's dedication and focus. As Atlas is said to be holding up the World, this gives Usain a noble and determined look, due to the resemblance.
Throughout the article, Usain Bolt is characterized as the hero, as the article explains how he is beloved by fans, and managed to raise spirits even after his loss. It highlights his sportsmanship and dedication. Bolt is explained to have accomplished his victories fairly, through continuous hard work.
When describing Justin Gatlin, the article switches tones. Gatlin is depicted, and even outright mentioned to be the villain. His controversies are highlighted, and he is constantly shown in a negative light. He is shunned for being "too old" for the sport and the article continuously refers his doping charge, showing him as a cheater.
The narrative is shaped in order to reflect a certain narrative. Shared information is curated to fit the "hero vs villain" archetype. For example, Usain Bolt is shown very positively, while the article omits the successes of Justin Gatlin. The second-place winner, Christian Coleman, is mostly neglected from the article, in order to eccentuate the rivalry between Bolt and Gatlin.
The article mitigates Usain Bolt's loss, instead focusing on how he managed to appease his fans and raise spirits. In addition with the image, it eulogises Usain Bolt's legacy, as it tries to convince the reader, that even if Usain Bolt lost the race, he was, and will be the true winner in the end. The "hero vs villain" archetype is used to set an underlying theme of how the good of Bolt will triumph over the evil of Gatlin.